Drug Information
Drug General Information | Top | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Drug ID |
D0B7EB
|
|||
Former ID |
DAP000786
|
|||
Drug Name |
Etoposide
|
|||
Synonyms |
etoposide; 33419-42-0; VePesid; Toposar; trans-Etoposide; Lastet; (-)-Etoposide; Zuyeyidal; Etoposidum; Etoposido; Vepesid J; Eposin; Etoposidum [INN-Latin]; Etoposide (VP16); VP 16-213; VP 16 (pharmaceutical); Etoposido [INN-Spanish]; Etopophos (phosphate salt); VP-16-213; 4-Demethylepipodophyllotoxin beta-D-ethylideneglucoside; VP 16213; UNII-6PLQ3CP4P3; NK 171; NSC 141540; CCRIS 2392; HSDB 6517; 4'-Demethylepipodophyllotoxin 9-(4,6-O-(R)-ethylidene-beta-D-glucopyranoside); EINECS 251-509-1; NSC-141540; Eposide; Etopol; Etosid; Vepeside; Demethyl EpipodophyllotoxinEthylidine Glucoside; E0675; Demethyl-epiodophyllotoxin ethylidene glucoside; Epipodophyllotoxin VP-16213; Eposin (TN); Etopophos (TN); Trans-Etoposide; VePESID (TN); Vepesid (TN); DEMETHY-EPIPODOPHYLLOTOXIN, ETHYLIDENE GLUCOSIDE; VP-16 (TN); Demethylepipodophyllotoxin-beta-D-ethylideneglucoside; Etoposide (JP15/USP/INN); Etoposide [USAN:INN:BAN:JAN]; Eposin, Vepesid, VP-16, Toposar, Etoposide; Epipodophyllotoxin, 4'-demethyl-, 4,6-O-ethylidene-beta-D-glucopyranoside; Epipodophyllotoxin, 4'-demethyl-, 4,6-O-ethylidene-beta-D-glucopyranoside (8CI); Epipodophyllotoxin, 4'-demethyl-, 9-(4,6-O-ethylidene-beta-D-glucopyranoside); 4'-Demethyl-epipodophyllotoxin 9-[4,6-O-(R)-ethylidene-beta-D-glucopyranoside; 4'-Demethylepipodophyllotoxin 9-(4,6-O-ethylidene-beta-D-glucopyranoside); 4'-Demethylepipodophyllotoxin ethylidene-beta-D-glucoside; 4'-O-Demethyl-1-O-(4,6-O-ethylidene-beta-D-glucopyranosyl)epipodophyllotoxin; 4-Demethylepipodophyllotoxin-beta-D-ethylideneglucoside
Click to Show/Hide
|
|||
Drug Type |
Small molecular drug
|
|||
Indication | Solid tumour/cancer [ICD-11: 2A00-2F9Z; ICD-10: C76-C80; ICD-9: 140-229] | Approved | [1], [2] | |
Therapeutic Class |
Anticancer Agents
|
|||
Company |
Bristol Myers Squibb Co Pharmaceutical Research Institute
|
|||
Structure |
Download2D MOL |
|||
Formula |
C29H32O13
|
|||
Canonical SMILES |
CC1OCC2C(O1)C(C(C(O2)OC3C4COC(=O)C4C(C5=CC6=C(C=C35)OCO6)C7=CC(=C(C(=C7)OC)O)OC)O)O
|
|||
InChI |
1S/C29H32O13/c1-11-36-9-20-27(40-11)24(31)25(32)29(41-20)42-26-14-7-17-16(38-10-39-17)6-13(14)21(22-15(26)8-37-28(22)33)12-4-18(34-2)23(30)19(5-12)35-3/h4-7,11,15,20-22,24-27,29-32H,8-10H2,1-3H3/t11-,15+,20-,21-,22+,24-,25-,26-,27-,29+/m1/s1
|
|||
InChIKey |
VJJPUSNTGOMMGY-MRVIYFEKSA-N
|
|||
CAS Number |
CAS 33419-42-0
|
|||
PubChem Compound ID | ||||
PubChem Substance ID |
4733, 597749, 7847193, 7979208, 8145856, 8174504, 11110521, 12013288, 14886949, 14935915, 24278178, 24769897, 34677904, 46386954, 46500626, 46505434, 47362874, 48182835, 48332078, 49681767, 49699016, 49855364, 53787668, 56463308, 57311878, 71825014, 75974183, 85148351, 85788790, 89850276, 92308660, 92308790, 99437037, 104019076, 104234176, 104324084, 117664408, 117682510, 119525100, 121363248, 124349593, 124659141, 124757097, 124800231, 124893613, 125163901, 127298729, 127298730, 127298731, 127298732
|
|||
ChEBI ID |
CHEBI:4911
|
|||
ADReCS Drug ID | BADD_D00854 | |||
SuperDrug ATC ID |
L01CB01
|
|||
SuperDrug CAS ID |
cas=033419420
|
Interaction between the Drug and Microbe | Top | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
The Metabolism of Drug Affected by Studied Microbe(s) | ||||
The Order in the Taxonomic Hierarchy of the following Microbe(s): Enterobacterales | ||||
Studied Microbe: Escherichia coli Nissle 1917
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[3] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Metabolic Effect | Decrease activity | |||
Description | Etoposide phosphate can be metabolized by Escherichia coli Nissle 1917, which results in the decrease of the drug's activity. | |||
The Abundace of Studied Microbe(s) Regulated by Drug | ||||
The Order in the Taxonomic Hierarchy of the following Microbe(s): Bacteroidales | ||||
Studied Microbe: Parabacteroides
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Increase | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Parabacteroides was increased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
The Order in the Taxonomic Hierarchy of the following Microbe(s): Bifidobacteriales | ||||
Studied Microbe: Bifidobacterium
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Bifidobacterium was decreased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Bifidobacterium adolescentis
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Bifidobacterium adolescentis was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 3.47E-04). | |||
The Order in the Taxonomic Hierarchy of the following Microbe(s): Coriobacteriales | ||||
Studied Microbe: Atopobium
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Increase | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Atopobium was increased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Collinsella
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Collinsella was decreased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Collinsella aerofaciens
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Collinsella aerofaciens was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 3.20E-07). | |||
The Order in the Taxonomic Hierarchy of the following Microbe(s): Eggerthellales | ||||
Studied Microbe: Adlercreutzia
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Adlercreutzia was decreased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
The Order in the Taxonomic Hierarchy of the following Microbe(s): Enterobacterales | ||||
Studied Microbe: Citrobacter
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Increase | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Citrobacter was increased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Klebsiella
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Increase | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Klebsiella was increased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
The Order in the Taxonomic Hierarchy of the following Microbe(s): Eubacteriales | ||||
Studied Microbe: Blautia
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Blautia was decreased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Blautia obeum
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Blautia obeum was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 1.63E-04). | |||
Studied Microbe: Clostridium
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Clostridium was decreased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Clostridium perfringens
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Clostridium perfringens was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 1.86E-04). | |||
Studied Microbe: Coprococcus
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Coprococcus was decreased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Coprococcus comes
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Coprococcus comes was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 3.25E-05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Dorea
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Dorea was decreased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Dorea formicigenerans
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Dorea formicigenerans was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 3.87E-04). | |||
Studied Microbe: Enterocloster bolteae
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Enterocloster bolteae was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 1.30E-05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Eubacterium rectale
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Eubacterium rectale was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 1.45E-03). | |||
Studied Microbe: Lachnospira
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Lachnospira was decreased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Lacrimispora saccharolytica
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Lacrimispora saccharolytica was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 2.41E-05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Oscillospira
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Oscillospira was decreased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Roseburia
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Roseburia was decreased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Roseburia hominis
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Roseburia hominis was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 5.47E-05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Roseburia intestinalis
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Roseburia intestinalis was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 8.01E-04). | |||
Studied Microbe: Ruminococcus
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Ruminococcus was decreased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Ruminococcus gnavus
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Ruminococcus gnavus was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 5.04E-06). | |||
Studied Microbe: Ruminococcus torques
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Ruminococcus torques was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 1.79E-05). | |||
The Order in the Taxonomic Hierarchy of the following Microbe(s): Lactobacillales | ||||
Studied Microbe: Enterococcus
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Increase | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Enterococcus was increased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Lactobacillus paracasei
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Lactobacillus paracasei was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 6.95E-06). | |||
Studied Microbe: Streptococcus parasanguinis
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Streptococcus parasanguinis was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 2.10E-05). | |||
Studied Microbe: Streptococcus salivarius
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[6] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experiment Method | High-throughput screening | |||
Description | The abundance of Streptococcus salivarius was decreased by Etoposide (adjusted p-values: 5.04E-06). | |||
The Order in the Taxonomic Hierarchy of the following Microbe(s): Tissierellales | ||||
Studied Microbe: Anaerococcus
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Decrease | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Anaerococcus was decreased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). | |||
The Order in the Taxonomic Hierarchy of the following Microbe(s): Veillonellales | ||||
Studied Microbe: Megasphaera
Show/Hide Hierarchy
|
[4], [5] | |||
Hierarchy | ||||
Abundance Change | Increase | |||
Experimental Species | Human | Experimental Sample | Faeces | |
Disease or Condition | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | |||
Description | The abundance of Megasphaera was increased by Combination of carmustine, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (p < 0.05). |
Drug Resistance Mutation (DRM) | Top | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
DRM | DRM Info |
Target and Pathway | Top | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Target(s) | DNA topoisomerase II (TOP2) | Target Info | Modulator | [7] |
References | Top | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
REF 1 | URL: http://www.guidetopharmacology.org Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Oct 12. pii: gkv1037. The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2016: towards curated quantitative interactions between 1300 protein targets and 6000 ligands. (Ligand id: 6815). | |||
REF 2 | Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years. J Nat Prod. 2007 Mar;70(3):461-77. | |||
REF 3 | Local bacteria affect the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs. Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 29;5:14554. | |||
REF 4 | Chemotherapy-driven dysbiosis in the intestinal microbiome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Sep;42(5):515-28. | |||
REF 5 | Pharmacomicrobiomics: exploiting the drug-microbiota interactions in anticancer therapies. Microbiome. 2018 May 22;6(1):92. | |||
REF 6 | Extensive impact of non-antibiotic drugs on human gut bacteria. Nature. 2018 Mar 29;555(7698):623-628. | |||
REF 7 | Etoposide, topoisomerase II and cancer.Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents.2005 Jul;5(4):363-72. |
If You Find Any Error in Data or Bug in Web Service, Please Kindly Report It to Dr. Zhou and Dr. Zhang.